
On it's list of 10 Ideas That Are Changing the World Right Now, Time Magazine listed The New Clavinism was #3. For me, this is exciting because I am a Reformed. I hesitate to use the term Calvinist because John Calvin was not a Calvinist, he was a leader in the Reformation, he was Reformed. Does my theology fall in sync with Calvinistic doctrines? It does. Do I celebrate John Calvin, his life, his rigor and the gracious gift that he is to the church? I do. Do I prefer the term Calvinist? No. Do I even prefer the term Reformed? I do, but I most prefer the term Christian. That is what I am--a Christian.
However, because the doctrines of grace and the teaching of the Gospel have been so distorted and millions of people across America (and the world) are being doped with bad doctrine, I at times feel forced to make distinctions. So, I am Reformed and if you must, I am a five point Calvinist (not a Hyper-Calvinist).
I've had a growing sense of the impact that Reformed theology is having on America's "twenty to thirty somethings", particularly Philadelphia and in the hip-hop culture. It's exciting to say the least--there is probably nothing that excites me more than seeing the grace of God manifested in people's growing passion for the Gospel and the glorious doctrines of the Bible. These are the seeds of revival, maybe even the budding fruit of revival--very exciting, and that's putting it lightly.
My question is this: Is this really the New Calvinism? John Calvin believed the Bible, the Bible is filled with old and ancient truths. Maybe I'm a stickler for words, their interpretation and their meaning, but the article begs the question, at least for me (and other Reformed twenty-somethings). Do I say, "I'm part of the New Calvism," because it sounds cool to say? Is it really new?