i read an article in "modern reformation" magazine titled "does justification still matter". the article dealt with the fact that the true doctrine of justification has taken a back seat in american "evangelicalism" and been replaced by this mixture of, sanctification by works + ten steps to. . . + pull yourself up by your own christian boot straps + emotional experiences and urges overriding the guidance and certainties provided in the Bible + my personal relationship with Jesus + "yes we're justified but. . ." now i knew, prior to reading the article that america has been plagued by this strange equation so that wasn't what "punched me". i have this thing in my brain that often plagues me (as i'm sure many do) that because i've sinned and because i'm a sinner, i can't do anything for God because it's not "holy enough" and it's done with mixed motives or something stupid like that. you follow? now, systematically i knew this was wrong, but experientially i couldn't get it past me. it was what i read in this magazine that "punched me" in a way that was freeing. almost like the wind of my disabling guilt was knocked free from my stomach. the expert of the article read as follows:
According to the account thus far, justification is not the first stage of the Christian life, but the constant wellspring of sanctification and good works. Luther summarizes, "'Because you believe in me,' God says, 'and your faith takes hold of Christ, whom I have freely given to you as your Justifier and Savior, therefore be righteous.' Thus God accepts you or accounts you righteous only on account of Christ, in whom you believe." (38) Whatever other piece of good news (concerning the new birth, Christ's conquest of sin's tyranny and promise to renew us throughout our life, the resurrection of our body and freedom from the presence of sin), much less the useful exhortations that we may offer, the announcement that Luther here summarizes alone creates and sustains the faith that not only justifies but sanctifies as well.
Good works now may be freely performed for God and neighbors without any fear of punishment or agony over the mixed motives of each act. Because of justification in Christ, even our good works can be "saved," not in order to improve either God's lot or our own, but our neighbor's. As Calvin explains,
But if, freed from this severe requirement of the law, or rather from the entire rigor of the law, they hear themselves called with fatherly gentleness by God, they will cheerfully and with great eagerness answer, and follow his leading. To sum up: Those bound by the yoke of the law are like servants assigned certain tasks for each day by their masters. These servants think they have accomplished nothing and dare not appear before their masters unless they have fulfilled the exact measure of their tasks. But sons, who are more generously and candidly treated by their fathers, do not hesitate to offer them incomplete and half-done and even defective works, trusting that their obedience and readiness of mind will be accepted by their fathers, even though they have not quite achieved what their fathers intended. Such children ought we to be, firmly trusting that our services will be approved by our most merciful Father, however small, rude, and imperfect these may be. . . . And we need this assurance in no slight degree, for without it we attempt everything in vain. (39)
"Because of justification," adds Ames, "the defilement of good works does not prevent their being accepted and rewarded by God." (40)
Not only does such a view properly ground works in faith, it also frees believers to love and serve their neighbors apart from the motive of gaining or fear of losing divine favor. It liberates us for a world-embracing activism that is deeply conscious that although our love and service contribute nothing to God and his evaluation of our persons, they are, however feebly, half-heartedly, and imperfectly performed, means through which God cares for creation.
after reading that i turned to Rom 5 and Rom 8:30 and Eph 2 and read it with a feeling of liberation. i felt freed up to do good works for God's glory without guilt and joyous because i've been justified by Christ. yes, there is still guilt and guilt is not all together bad, in fact i've heard it quoted from (i think jonathan edwards) "let your guilt be much". if it weren't for guilt i wouldn't know i was guilty and i wouldn't know i've sinned against God. but i think this kind of guilt is better known as conviction and so it leads believers to repentance. so yes, i am still guilty but the beauty is God says i'm forgiven. AMAZING! CONFOUNDING! because i'm forgiven and loved by God i'm free to ask for more grace and do good works for God and others without fear that He will or will not love me any less or any more. i'm free to live for God, as broken and as imperfect as i may be, i'm free! i took a deep breath as the Cross gave a blow to the self-condemning knot in my stomach and praised God for the Gospel! in the words of a dear and beloved brother of mine, "it feels so good to be justified". and it does.
For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly. For one will scarcely die for a righteous person--though perhaps for a good person one would dare even to die--but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him form the wrath of God. For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life. More than that, we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have new received reconciliation. (Rom 5:6-11)
I will establish my covenant with you, and you shall know that I am the LORD, that you may remember and be confounded, and never open your mouth again because of your shame, when I atone for you for all that you have done, declares the Lord God. (Ezekial 16:62-63)
Here's a link to the online line issue of "Modern Reformaiton" where the article came from: "The Art of Self-Justificaiton"